Personal Scoring in the EU: Not quite Black Mirror yet, at least if you‘re rich

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

von: Nicolas Kayser-Bril (AlgorithmWatch, Berlin)

The TV show "Black Mirror" has widely been used to illustrate what a centralized, permanent and public personal scoring system would look like. How likely is the application of such a system in the countries of the European Union?

Inhalt

The current wave of citizen scoring begs the question: why now? It was very clear that the digitization of government data did allow for such practices as early as in the 1970s. It was, technically at least, possible for public authorities to engage in citizen scoring forty years ago in countries that did have a NIN, such as Denmark or France. No major piece of legislation entered in force that would have made citizen scoring easier, so that it would be hard to argue that a change in the legal systems caused these new practices.

The fears of Black Mirror’s Nosedive episode are irrational. On the one hand, an all-encompassing citizen score would be impractical and useless. Because it would aggregate dimensions that are unrelated to each other, and because it would be extremely unlikely for an individual to score evenly across all of them, a comprehensive citizen score would merge information from different areas that would even each other out (to take an extreme example, a jailed criminal might be positively viewed by prison personnel because of her good behavior).

On the other hand, most experiments with citizen scoring nowadays aim at reducing the number of political options that can be publicly debated, for governance through numbers does not allow for political debate.[2] This political project does not require a ubiquitous score for all citizens but only for those with the least power or those who might challenge the political order. As Antonia Hmaidi (2018), an economist, said of the Chinese social management systems, the very concept of a single score is utterly useless. By merging inputs from all possible sources, the resulting number cannot be used for any purpose.

Weitere Informationen

  • Produktion: 11.10.2019

  • Spieldauer: 00:18:41

  • hrsg. von: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung/bpb

Themen

Creative Commons License

Dieser Text und Medieninhalt sind unter der Creative Commons Lizenz "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International" veröffentlicht. Autor/-in: Berlin) Nicolas Kayser-Bril (AlgorithmWatch für bpb.de

Sie dürfen den Text unter Nennung der Lizenz CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 und des/der Autors/-in teilen.


Weitere Medien zum Thema

Beyond

Beyond "Digital Big Brother": Five things to understand about China's Social Scoring System

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

In her talk Ohlberg analyses the current state of China's social credit system by neither trivializing nor dramatizing it. In her opinion, the social credit system is "a highly effective tool helping to enforce the Chinese code of law" but... Weiter...

Blacklists and Social Credit Regimes in China

Blacklists and Social Credit Regimes in China

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

The Chinese social credit system CSC represents a new regulatory methodology. Catá Backer´s object in this essay is to encourage fresh thinking among Westerners. In his opinion, China is not only a harbinger of transformations in technology, but... Weiter...

Scoring is not a new phenomena: we can learn from experience how to deal with scoring

Scoring is not a new phenomena: we can learn from experience how to deal with scoring

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Scores are numerical ratings used to predict or steer people’s behavior. These numerical ratings are usually calculated via algorithmic processes based on a broad range of data (see, e. g., AlgorithmWatch 2019). Wagner gives a brief historical... Weiter...

Data Scores as Governance: Mapping and Analysing Changing Practices in the UK

Data Scores as Governance: Mapping and Analysing Changing Practices in the UK

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Governments at all levels use more and more predictive technologies. The Data Justice Lab at Cardiff University investigates where and how local authorities across the UK use data systems. The results of this project are presented by Joanna Redden. Weiter...

Shared responsibilities? The future of scoring in the context of shifting baselines and public science

Shared responsibilities? The future of scoring in the context of shifting baselines and public science

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Digitalization intensifies the correlation between organization and control. A seemingly harmless example of this is self-tracking. People measure themselves in an increasing number of life spheres, supposedly voluntarily, while carrying... Weiter...

On the function and legitimation of scoring

On the function and legitimation of scoring

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Scoring relies on data or methods of classification. With this in mind, does scoring lead to automation of discrimination? Are its creators still capable of keeping track with their decision making processes? Lorena Jaume-Palasí presents her... Weiter...

Identity and Integrity: The Ethical Relevance of Super-Scores

Identity and Integrity: The Ethical Relevance of Super-Scores

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Digital decision making relies on data and predefined criteria, but lacks when being implemented non-technical parameters like a social environment or basic human values. Christine Woopen, however, disagrees and explains in her talk why these values... Weiter...

Ethical Aspects of Algorithms and Scoring in Pedagogical and Social Work Contexts

Ethical Aspects of Algorithms and Scoring in Pedagogical and Social Work Contexts

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Algorithms and scoring play an increasing role in social work as well as in pedagogical contexts. In her talk Nadia Kutscher discusses what it means that social work is being part of practices producing sensitive and score-related data about clients.... Weiter...

Being scored but informed – how to boost people´s risk literacy for public discourse

Being scored but informed – how to boost people´s risk literacy for public discourse

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

I do not need to know how a bus works, for taking the bus!? – Wrong! Algorithm sovereignty actually is about being the object of others’ analyses, or better, about putting control on that. Felix G. Rebitscheck focuses in his talk on the... Weiter...

Scoring practices - consequences for education in democratic societies

Scoring practices - consequences for education in democratic societies

Super-Scoring? Data-driven societal technologies in China and Western-style democracies as a new challenge for education

Data storage and processing have become a politically relevant topic. Media literacy and media education play an important role. Technological education is thus political education. Political education thus requires basic technical knowledge or at... Weiter...

Nach oben © Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung Zur klassischen Website von bpb.de wechseln